Saturday 6 February 2016

WHAT IF

REVIEWS NO-ONE ASKED FOR

by Ashton Brown

WHAT IF dir Michael Dowse

"All this love shit's complicated."


I would post *spoiler alert* but if you actually think this rom-com is going to offer you any suprises then you are picking the wrong movie. Romantic comedy is such a predictable genre. Being a massive emotional wuss, I am not above being affected by it's charm when it has charm to offer. For me, if a rom-com is going to impress, it needs to be brave enough to move away from the predictable, try and avoid an ending we can see coming from the beginning and at least trick me into thinking that it might not work out all roses and chocolates in the end. 

What If has some lovely moments. From a comedy perspective - the first half of the film has genuinely sharp, witty writing. Think Gilmore Girls both in the style of writing and the delivery of the dialogue from the leads. What If is the story of the "friendzone" (a term I am reluctant to use as it suggests that a woman's desire to be nothing more than friends with a male is somewhat a problem). We meet broken man Wallace (Daniel Radcliffe), Wallace meets girls at party (Zoe Kazan). She is quirky. She treats guy differently than girls from his past. Girl has boyfriend. Boyfriend isn't a dick. Can they just handle being friends? Hollywood has this wonderful way of constantly trying to convince us ,that men and woman can't possibly have a platonic friendship, and even if they can, in the end they are better off being in a relationship. I hate this notion - not only because of the expectations it sets for us in reality but also because sometimes friendships between opposite genders is awesome and unique and should be appreciated and respected instead of forced to evolve to involve rooting. I spent the whole time thinking that the friendship between the leads was so genuinely good that this film would exceed my expectations if it left them that way. 

The chemistry between the leads is good enough - believable even. But for me there were two far more interesting relationships in the movie that I would have rather followed than the typical "will they, won't they" nature of the leads. Wallace and his best friend Allan (the always incredible Adam Driver) have an extremely likeable, believable and interesting bromance. Their chemistry is stronger than that of Wallace & Chantry (yeap that's her name) and I found their dialogue to be more interesting. Similarly Allans relationship with the wonderful Nicole (Mackenzie Davis) is one that begins near the start of the film and is a far more interesting and realistic look into modern relationships. The shortfall for me of What If is that the supporting characters were much, much more interesting than the leads. Having said that, the story has some genuine laughs and Radcliffe does a solid job of Wallace. 

I felt the film forced us to want Wallace and Chantry to get together despite failing to provide any reason why they should be. Yes they had chemistry. Yes they laughed at the same shit. But Chantry's chemistry with her boyfriend of 5 years was much more believable and I often found myself struggling to root for Wallace and Chantry. Why can't they just be friends? Why isn't friendship as awesome as a non-platonic relationship? Why can't Hollywood learn to provide us with stories that don't all feel the same way? Why? Why? Why?

Overall What If is great if you are at home sick, feeling sorry for yourself or it's raining outside and you have nothing better to do. It is by no means a bad film. But if you have seen a rom-com, then you have seen this. The opposite sex can be friends. Just not in film. 

2.5 out of 5.

Friday 5 February 2016

KINGSMAN: THE SECRET SERVICE

REVIEWS NO-ONE ASKED FOR

by Ashton Brown

KINGSMAN: THE SECRET SERVICE dir Matthew Vaughn


THE FILM SAMUEL L JACKSON ALMOST RUINED

Now I am not anti-Samuel L Jackson. I like Pulp Fiction as much as the rest of you. But over the past few years (10 years to be fair) I have noticed his ability to either bring down a film or signpost a bad film. I usually avoid a film if he is the draw card, or notice that I can usually tell how average a film will be if he's in it before watching it (Robocop 2014 - even Gary Oldman couldn't save this bad boy). However the cast consisting of the exceptional Colin Firth and the very predictable but wholly enjoyable Michael Caine - plus recommendations from friends and family - led me to sit on the couch on a Friday night to see what this film was all about.

Going in, I always assumed that Kingsman was a 'M' rated family film. I guess that this preconception was somewhat related to the fact that I knew it was about a young 20s type chap who becomes a secret agent. This film very quickly became more Hot Fuzz than Agent Cody Banks - much to my delight (no offence Frankie).

Kingsman: The Secret Service is incredibly British. Not necessarily to it's detriment - if anything this is what give it it's charm. With clear references to Bond (both score wise and in general tone) and slick action sequences, it is well worth watching if you can ignore some ridiculous plot holes and weak writing moments. The action is so slickly directed that, one sequence set in a church in particular, is completely mesmerising and beautiful in it's composition, direction and cinematography. Gorgeously stylistic action sequences, in fact, are what sets this film above others of it's type. At times I found myself frustrated with some appalling plot decisions but when these proved to be misdirection I stopped yelling at the TV and enjoyed having been fooled. Given the access to technology in the film, a certain moment involving balloons felt more like a chance for drama than sitting comfortably in the world the film had created but I was able to laugh it off and still enjoy the rest of the climatic moments that the film offered.

Back to Samuel L Jackson. Jackson is so abhorrently weak in this film that during the first half it almost felt like two different films - the sequences with him felt like some camp Ali G spin off and the sequences without felt like this extremely British film that used humour as effectively as it did action. When the two story lines finally met I couldn't help but feel cheated out of a real villain instead of a lisp and some Snakes on a Plane type acting.

Other than a weak ending that only Bond fans wouldn't cringe at, and my clear dislike of Jackson in the villains chair, overall the film was an enjoyable journey with some gorgeous directional choices, a superb score (a clear tribute to spy/bond films in the composition) and an overall slickness to a film that is well worth watching if you are home on a rainy day.

3 out of 5.